QC Tab Guide
The Quality Control (QC) tab provides diagnostic visualizations to assess the quality of your multi-echo fMRI data and tedana processing.
Overview
The QC tab displays:
- Brain maps derived from multi-echo fitting
- Histograms of parameter distributions
- Diagnostic time series plots
These visualizations help you identify data quality issues that may affect component classification.
Brain Maps
T2* Map
What it shows: The estimated T2* relaxation time at each voxel.
How to interpret:
| Region | Expected T2* | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Gray matter | 30-50 ms | Varies by field strength |
| White matter | 40-60 ms | Slightly longer than GM |
| CSF | Very long | May appear saturated |
| Air/bone | Very short/zero | Signal dropout |
What to look for:
- Uniform values in gray matter: Good data quality
- Spotty or noisy: Motion or acquisition issues
- Very low values near sinuses: Expected susceptibility dropout
- Asymmetric patterns: Potential shimming issues
Field Strength Matters
T2* values scale with field strength. Values above are approximate for 3T.
S0 Map
What it shows: The estimated signal intensity at TE=0 (proton density weighted).
How to interpret:
| Feature | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Bright gray matter | Normal |
| Bright CSF | Normal |
| Dark white matter | Normal |
| Very bright spots | Possible vessels or artifacts |
| Dark spots in brain | Signal dropout |
What to look for:
- Smooth intensity: Good coil sensitivity
- Bright edges: Potential surface artifacts
- Rings or bands: Acquisition artifacts
RMSE Map
What it shows: Root Mean Square Error of the multi-echo fitting.
How to interpret:
| RMSE Level | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Low (dark) | Good model fit |
| High (bright) | Poor fit, unreliable estimates |
What to look for:
- Low RMSE in gray matter: Model fits well
- High RMSE at edges: Expected due to partial voluming
- High RMSE in brain interior: Potential issues with:
- Motion
- Physiological noise
- Multi-echo timing errors
Histograms
Histograms show the distribution of values across the brain.
T2* Histogram
- X-axis: T2* values (ms)
- Y-axis: Number of voxels
What to look for:
- Main peak at 30-50 ms: Normal gray matter
- Secondary peak: May indicate white matter or different tissue
- Long tail to high values: CSF contribution
- Spike at zero: Masked voxels
S0 Histogram
- Shows distribution of signal intensity
- Should show smooth distribution
- Outliers may indicate artifacts
Time Series Plots
Diagnostic temporal plots help identify:
- Global signal fluctuations: Large-scale intensity changes
- Motion effects: Sudden shifts in signal
- Scanner drift: Slow intensity changes over time
Using QC for Classification
QC information can inform your component classification:
| QC Finding | Classification Impact |
|---|---|
| High RMSE region | Components localized here may be unreliable |
| Signal dropout | Expect fewer reliable components in dropout areas |
| Motion artifacts in QC | Be more skeptical of edge-localized components |
Troubleshooting
Maps Not Showing
If brain maps don't appear:
-
Check that files exist in your tedana output:
T2starmap.nii*S0map.nii*rmse_statmap.nii*
-
These files are optional tedana outputs - not all tedana runs generate them
Unexpected Values
| Issue | Possible Cause |
|---|---|
| T2* values too high | Wrong TE values provided |
| T2* values too low | Field inhomogeneity |
| Noisy S0 map | Motion during acquisition |
| High RMSE everywhere | Fundamental data quality issue |
Best Practices
-
Review QC before classifying: Understanding data quality helps calibrate expectations
-
Note problem regions: If QC shows issues in specific areas, be cautious about components localized there
-
Compare across subjects: Consistent QC issues may indicate systematic problems
-
Document findings: Note any QC concerns for your records
QC Checklist
Before trusting your classifications:
- [ ] T2* map shows reasonable values in gray matter
- [ ] S0 map is smooth without major artifacts
- [ ] RMSE is low in brain interior
- [ ] No unexpected patterns in any maps
- [ ] Histograms show expected distributions